All suppliers re-screened against the Eczema Requirements Spec. No manufacturer has documented eczema products, an NEA/EAA mark or published fragrance-free line controls (best 4/5). The eczema proof sits with the testers: Eurofins (8-week study on adults with eczema) owns Dermatest Sydney. Moved up: Cellular Cosmetics, My Skincare Manufacturer, BiomeCentric, The INCI Lab.
EAA's Emerging Brands tier = the only eczema mark usable on AU packs (Amperna and Dermal Therapy are partners). Eczema Support Australia for lived-experience input + early testers. Formulate to the NEA Ecz-clusion List now (free). Free starter formulas: IMCD, Ingredients Plus, Alchemy (BASF). Actives: Evonik SK-INFLUX ceramides, Symrise SymCalmin.
Independent labs; client owns the IP. Good Chemistry's R&D focuses on skin barrier and moisture loss. Plus a fixed-fee P1 spray feasibility study from Formulytica (Melbourne).
One formula for both formats. MVP pump via New Directions (from 100 units). BOV quotes: Pax Australia (new find: BOV + creams, TGA licence + ISO 22716), Aeropac (5k MOQ), Moorebank. US benchmark: Prime Matter Labs / InSpec.
Tripak: TGA licence + ISO 22716 pharmacy creams in tubes. My Skincare Manufacturer is the only one that states eczema-prone / very sensitive skin work. Epilab: eye care in range, 500-unit pilot.
The easiest product to make. BiomeCentric: no minimum batch, barrier focus. Imaginelle: ISO 22716 cleansers. Shieling (NZ): 1,000 units, formulas exclusive to each client.
Verify Dermatest as the AU base for patch testing and sensitive-skin in-use studies. Rough budget: A$25–50k minimum launch testing + A$25–50k claim studies (estimates).
Every critical unknown (IP terms, real MOQs, BOV appetite at 5k, P1 spray feasibility) can only be answered by the supplier. Capital picture: 3 formulas ~A$15–45k + testing ~A$50–100k + 3 MOQs. Nobody has been contacted yet (research mode).
| Name | Where | Fits | Tier · score | Eczema | Horizon | MOQ | Formula IP | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skinterest site → Best-fit AU independent development lab: client-owned IP, runs testing in-house or through partners, and has no factory to push you into. | Sydney (inner west), NSW | P1 · P2 · P3 | A · 20/25 | 3/5 | now | No MOQ for development (it is a lab, not a factory); fees not published | client owns — \"formulations are the IP of our clients in all situations\ | screened |
| Good Chemistry site → The closest match to Spanner's model: an independent lab whose R&D is focused on skin barrier and TEWL, which hands over formula, method and specs, and isn't tied to any manufacturer. | New Zealand | P1 · P2 · P3 | A · 19/25 | 3/5 | now | no MOQ (independent agency); fees via packages, not published | client owns outright — formula, method, specs issued on final payment | screened |
| Formulytica site → The most technically rigorous AU option, with pharma-grade topical and ophthalmic know-how. Likely overkill on price for a bootstrapped brand, but worth calling in for P1's spray-lipid problem. | Mulgrave (Melbourne), VIC | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 18/25 | 4/5 | later | unknown — pharma CDMO pricing likely (quote needed) | unknown — says it generates new IP for clients; confirm assignment | screened |
| The INCI Lab site → An indie-focused NZ studio with full IP transfer and optional small-batch manufacturing: a good bridge from prototype to first run. | Auckland, NZ | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 18/25 | 4/5 | now | low-MOQ small-batch manufacturing (qty not found); Formula Supplied testing NZ$1,750–2,250; Visionary custom quote-only | client owns — full IP transfer (Visionary tier) | screened |
| Freelance Formulations site → Transparent pricing and 100% client IP, but US-based and generalist. A price benchmark more than a first choice. | USA (remote) | P1 · P3 | B · 16/25 | 2/5 | now | IP-ownership packages from US$3,900; stock from US$4,500; custom from US$15,000 | client owns 100% once paid in full | screened |
| MySwissLab site → A credible EU-standard lab with published price bands, but ownership terms are unclear and it also manufactures, so independence needs checking. | Switzerland (remote) | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 15/25 | 2/5 | now | projects from €2,500; custom formulation €2,500–15,000 | unknown | screened |
| Ceechem site → Mainly a raw-material distributor with an applications and formulation service. Useful for ingredient access (ceramides, emollients), but its independence is limited. | Melbourne, VIC (plus NZ presence) | P1 · P3 | B · 13/25 | 3/5 | now | unknown | unknown | screened |
| Name | Where | Fits | Tier · score | Eczema | Horizon | MOQ | Formula IP | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grace Kingdom Beauty site → A senior, high-profile US chemist whose model is built on client-owned formulas. Strong mentor value, but US fees and time zones are a drag. | New Jersey, USA (remote) | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 18/25 | 3/5 | now | no MOQ; fees not published (prototype-only or turnkey packages) | client owns formulas and development work | screened |
| Botanic Inspiration site → Cheap, formula-owned and fixed-scope, but built for home-lab and natural makers. Not the right depth for a BOV barrier-lipid serum. | Hunter Valley, NSW | P3 | B · 15/25 | 2/5 | now | no MOQ; ~A$750–1,050 per formula (per vault note Jun 2026; not re-verified) | client owns (per vault note Jun 2026) | screened |
| Cosmetic Scientist (London) site → An experienced UK body-care formulator with clear day-rate pricing. Useful for P1/P3 texture work, but ownership terms and sensitive-skin credentials are unconfirmed. | London, UK | P1 · P3 | B · 14/25 | 2/5 | now | £700/day (May 2024); first formula = 5-day minimum (~£3,500); samples ~2 months | unknown | screened |
| The Green Chemist site → A respected natural/organic formulator. The green-formulation focus doesn't match Spanner's fragrance-free barrier-lipid brief, so she is a backup only. | Somerset, UK (remote) | P3 | B · 13/25 | 1/5 | now | unknown | unknown | screened |
| Name | Where | Fits | Tier · score | Eczema | Horizon | MOQ | Formula IP | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epilab site → NEW FIND — best-matched VIC option: custom-only, 500-unit pilots, client owns the formula, and it already makes serums, mists, eye care and cleansers. | Cheltenham, VIC | P1 · P2 · P3 | A · 19/25 | 3/5 | both | 500-unit pilot MOQ (negotiable; packaging often sets the real floor) | client owns finished formula (base technology stays Epilab IP) | screened |
| Labwork site → Chemist-led, 500-unit runs, explicitly sells ownable formulas with direct chemist access — the best startup/IP fit in QLD; quality systems need checking. | Sunshine Coast, QLD | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 18/25 | 2/5 | both | 500–1,000 units/SKU first run | client owns (ownable formulas) | screened |
| BiomeCentric site → Skin-barrier/microbiome-first custom house with no MOQ — the closest philosophical match to Spanner in QLD; confirm certs and IP. | Gold Coast, QLD | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 17/25 | 4/5 | both | no minimum batch size; NPD packages from $5,999 | unknown | screened |
| My Skincare Manufacturer site → Strongest documented eczema / very-sensitive-skin manufacturing claim in NSW — shortlist, but pin down the 150 kg batch minimum and IP terms. | Beresfield, NSW | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 17/25 | 4/5 | both | Low MOQ claimed for startups; FAQ cites 150 kg per vessel per batch | unknown | screened |
| Australian Private Label site → Startup-friendly custom NPD with published PET + stability packages and client-retained IP — good first-quote candidate; verify who actually manufactures. | Sydney, NSW | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 16/25 | 2/5 | now | Depends on product/packaging; 'some projects suited to smaller startup runs' | client owns (per June audit) | screened |
| Cawarra Cosmetics site → New find: 40-year certified-organic maker that never repeats a formula across clients and runs from 1,000 units — good B-tier option if IP is assigned. | Billinudgel, NSW | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 16/25 | 2/5 | now | Small batches from 1,000 units (bottles, tubes, jars) | unknown (unique formula per brand) | screened |
| Cellular Cosmetics site → 1,000-unit custom MOQ with no off-the-shelf bases — accessible and fast, but no real sensitive-skin credentials beyond a stock unscented cream. | Molendinar, QLD | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 16/25 | 4/5 | both | 1,000 units custom; 10 units white label (June note) | unknown | screened |
| Cosmetic Alchemist site → Compounding-pharmacy roots and no MOQ make it a good small-run eye-cream candidate; spray capability and certifications are unknown. | Gold Coast, QLD | P2 · P3 | B · 16/25 | 3/5 | now | no MOQ (claimed) | unknown | screened |
| Imaginelle site → Well-rounded, certified NSW maker with serums, cleansers, baby care and airless formats at a 1,000-unit basis — a realistic main-manufacturer candidate. | Newcastle, NSW | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 16/25 | 3/5 | both | 1,000 units per product (pricing basis) | unknown | screened |
| Shieling Laboratories site → NZ's longest-running contract cosmetics house; exclusive custom formulas from ~1,000 units — solid B, IP wording to confirm. | Mount Wellington, Auckland, NZ | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 16/25 | 2/5 | both | 1,000 units for some products; 100 kg bulk minimum; 50–100 kg runs | unknown (formulas custom & exclusive to each client) | screened |
| Tripak Pharmaceuticals site → Pharma-grade quality with pharmacy-brand creams/ointments experience and startup support; no spray capability — strong P2 candidate. | Capalaba, QLD | P2 · P3 | B · 16/25 | 3/5 | both | unknown (packaging-services page lists MOQs) | unknown | screened |
| Auskin Laboratories site → Solid, certified all-rounder (formerly H&H Australia) with in-house stability/PET/patch testing — needs MOQ and IP answers before it can rank higher. | Silverwater, NSW | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 15/25 | 3/5 | both | unknown | unknown | screened |
| Baxter Laboratories site → Top-tier derm/pharmacy capability (Cetaphil lineage) but built for multinationals — a phase-2 scale-up candidate, not a launch partner. | Melbourne, VIC | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 15/25 | 4/5 | later | unknown (serves multinationals; likely high) | unknown | screened |
| Byron Compounding Chemist site → Tiny-MOQ pharmacist-led lab — great for prototyping P2 samples, not a scale manufacturer. | Byron Bay, NSW | P2 | B · 15/25 | 3/5 | now | 6 units per line (private label); custom formulation fee quoted per project | unknown | screened |
| Creme Factory site → Founder-led organic small-run maker with baby-care formulation — pleasant fit for a founder, but organic bias vs fragrance-free brief. | Motueka (Nelson/Tasman), NZ | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 15/25 | 3/5 | now | Small-to-medium runs (no number) | unknown | screened |
| Delta Laboratories site → Highest-compliance NSW option (TGA-licensed liquids, semi-solids, sunscreens) that courts emerging brands — strong backup, sensitive-skin proof missing. | Somersby, NSW | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 15/25 | 2/5 | both | unknown | unknown | screened |
| New Laboratories site → Well-certified mid-to-large house with 300+ formulas; quality is strong but small-run access and IP terms are unproven. | Braeside, VIC | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 15/25 | 2/5 | later | unknown | unknown | screened |
| Peerage Products site → Six-decade GMP maker that explicitly supports boutique brands with 80 kg batches and small tubes — good P2 fit, sensitive proof missing. | Christchurch, NZ | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 15/25 | 2/5 | both | Batches 80–2,000 kg; fills 3 g tubes to IBCs | unknown | screened |
| Concept Labs site → Solid, family-owned, ISO/GMP mid-size maker since 1998 that supports emerging brands; nothing sensitive-specific. | Maroochydore, QLD | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 14/25 | 2/5 | both | unknown ('small run' to large repeat) | unknown | screened |
| Cosmetic Manufacturers Australia site → NEW FIND — 36-year TGA/ACO-licensed Gold Coast maker of natural and therapeutic skincare; worth a quote request. | Gold Coast, QLD | P2 · P3 | B · 14/25 | 3/5 | later | unknown | unknown | screened |
| EMA Labs site → Family-owned, chemist-led, calls itself a short-run specialist — but the only published MOQ (2,000) is for base formulas and IP terms are unclear. | Gold Coast, QLD | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 14/25 | 2/5 | both | 2,000 units/SKU for white-label & base formulations; custom MOQ unknown | unknown | screened |
| Ensign Laboratories site → The only VIC house here with in-house aerosol formulation + filling (since 1955) — a real P1 lead, but large-scale and not sensitive-skin specialised. | Mulgrave, VIC | P1 · P3 | B · 14/25 | 2/5 | later | unknown (500-staff operation; likely high) | unknown | screened |
| Greenleaf Cosmetics site → NEW FIND — ISO 22716-certified 9,000 m² facility with a 50 kg minimum batch (~500 × 100 mL): credible quality, but sustainability-led, not sensitive-skin-led. | Laverton North, VIC | P1 · P3 | B · 14/25 | 2/5 | both | unknown; batches from 50 kg | unknown | screened |
| Nowchem Pharma & Skincare site → Pharma-grade TGA-licensed cream/liquid maker with a real sensitive-skin baby brand reference — credible, but likely built for larger runs. | Shoalhaven, NSW | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 14/25 | 3/5 | later | unknown | unknown | screened |
| Cosmed Group site → Capable NZ OEM/ODM with baby-care and cosmeceutical work, but it keeps formula IP by default — a deal-breaker unless negotiated. | East Tāmaki, Auckland, NZ | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 13/25 | 3/5 | both | Flexible (no number published) | manufacturer owns (by default; exceptions negotiable) | screened |
| Ross Laboratories site → NEW FIND — 90-year TGA-licensed private-label giant; quality is solid, but the tank sizes rule it out for a 500–1,000-unit launch. | Tullamarine, VIC | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 13/25 | 2/5 | later | unknown (600–6,000 L tanks imply large runs) | unknown | screened |
| The Beauty Lab Collective site → Well-certified NZ full-service maker (incl. medical manufacturing) — compliance strong, startup terms unknown. | NZ (city unconfirmed) | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 13/25 | 3/5 | later | unknown | unknown | screened |
| pH Factor site → Chemist-led development + education house (Rita Sellars) — valuable brain, but manufacturing scale and terms are unclear. | Narwee, NSW | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 13/25 | 2/5 | now | unknown | unknown | screened |
| AMK Formulations site → 3,000-unit MOQ and ISO 9001 (not 22716) — scale-up option only. | Coombabah, QLD | P1 · P3 | C · 12/25 | 2/5 | later | 3,000 units | unknown | screened |
| Aus Cosmetics site → New find via ASCC: independent fill-and-pack skincare maker with tube/liquid lines — viable manufacturer, but no formulation or sensitive-skin evidence. | Cronulla area, NSW | P1 · P2 · P3 | C · 12/25 | 2/5 | later | unknown | unknown | screened |
| Health Focus Manufacturers site → NEW FIND — ISO 22716, family-owned, carbon-neutral; quality credible but aimed at established brands. | Clontarf, QLD | P1 · P2 · P3 | C · 12/25 | 2/5 | later | unknown (serves 'world's leading brands') | unknown | screened |
| New Directions Australia site → Base-customisation house — cheap and fast for testing, but not a route to a unique, owned sensitive-skin formula. | Sydney, NSW | P1 · P3 | C · 12/25 | 2/5 | now | Private label from 100 units (3+ products); custom MOQ unknown | unknown (base-customisation model) | screened |
| Papaver site → The only SA custom skincare maker found — boutique small-run specialist, worth a quote call for P2, but compliance and sensitive-skin proof are thin. | Adelaide Hills, SA | P1 · P2 · P3 | C · 12/25 | 2/5 | now | Small runs; fills 1–500 mL (exact minimum unknown) | unknown | screened |
| Solskin Beauty Labs site → White-label-first house with a tanning core; custom work is pricier and there's no sensitive-skin evidence. | Keysborough, VIC | P1 · P3 | C · 12/25 | 2/5 | later | small-batch runs offered; custom formulas carry larger MOQs than white label (figure not published) | unknown | screened |
| The Blend Co site → ASCC-listed boutique-to-volume blender with an in-house lab; plausible small-run option but almost nothing verifiable on quality or sensitive-skin work. | Melbourne, VIC | P1 · P3 | C · 12/25 | 2/5 | now | unknown (does 'smaller boutique runs') | unknown | screened |
| Vida Labs site → New find: Sydney one-roof formulation-to-warehouse operation with ISO 22716 — worth a discovery call; almost nothing else known. | Rydalmere, NSW | P1 · P2 · P3 | C · 12/25 | 2/5 | both | unknown | unknown | longlist |
| Wild Child Laboratories site → Capable, TGA-grade Perth lab, but 5,000–10,000-unit minimums rule it out for launch. | Malaga, WA | P1 · P2 · P3 | C · 12/25 | 2/5 | later | 5,000 units (100–500 mL); 10,000 for tubes | unknown | screened |
| ANC Projects site → 5,000-unit MOQ and SEO-heavy private-label positioning — poor fit for a bootstrapped sensitive-skin launch. | Melbourne, VIC | P1 · P3 | C · 10/25 | 2/5 | later | 5,000 units | unknown | screened |
| Auskem Laboratories site → Family-run general contract maker leaning to hair/body wash — little evidence for a sensitive-skin leave-on range. | Wetherill Park, NSW | P1 · P3 | C · 10/25 | 2/5 | both | unknown | unknown | screened |
| Beauty NZ site → Skincare/sun/hair contract maker with a 'new brand' pathway — too little info to rank. | Mosgiel, Otago, NZ | P1 · P2 | C · 9/25 | 2/5 | now | unknown | unknown | longlist |
| Pauling Industries site → General liquids contract manufacturer — minimum 100 L per order; not a sensitive-skin specialist. Park. | NZ (city unconfirmed) | P1 · P3 | C · 9/25 | 2/5 | both | Orders 100 L to 10,000+ L per day | unknown | longlist |
| Mother Earth Aromatherapy site → Aromatherapy/essential-oil private labeller — fundamentally at odds with a fragrance-free, sensitive-skin brief. Park. | South Fremantle, WA | - | C · 7/25 | 1/5 | now | unknown | manufacturer owns (uses their proven formulas) | dropped |
| Name | Where | Fits | Tier · score | Eczema | Horizon | MOQ | Formula IP | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prime Matter Labs site → The best skincare-grade turnkey BOV developer found. It formulates sun/skin/body products *and* runs a dedicated BOV facility. Its weaknesses are unknown MOQ and a US base (DG import). | USA (HQ location not confirmed in snippets) | P1 | B · 18/25 | 3/5 | later | not published — ask | custom formulation offered; ownership terms unknown | screened |
| InSpec Solutions site → A skincare/sunscreen manufacturer that fills BOV in-house on one site (13 lines). Its published MOQ is 10,000, twice the AU floor. | Holly Hill, Florida, USA | P1 | B · 17/25 | 3/5 | later | 10,000 units [search snippet, two sources] | private-label + custom; ownership unknown | screened |
| Pax Australia site → The strongest Australian BOV lead found: an established aerosol + liquid + cream/lotion filler that lists bag-on-valve and has cosmetic GMP and a TGA licence. It is a big operation, so a small first run is the main question. | Ingleburn (south-west Sydney), NSW | P1 | B · 17/25 | 3/5 | later | not published — ask | unknown — ask (has in-house R&D) | screened |
| Above Aerosol site → A SoCal aerosol + BOV lab built for indie beauty ('lowest MOQ in the beauty industry' = 10,000). It fills BOV skincare mists. A good benchmark, but not lower than AU. | Southern California, USA | P1 | B · 16/25 | 3/5 | later | from 10,000 units [search snippet] | offers in-house + custom formulations; ownership unknown | longlist |
| BOV Solutions site → A long-running (since 1982) BOV + traditional aerosol manufacturer serving personal care, baby, sun care and OTC. Established and BOV-native, but no MOQ published. | USA (Ohio per common listings — unverified) | P1 | B · 16/25 | 3/5 | later | not published — ask | private label + contract; ownership unknown | longlist |
| Aeropac site → A real, reachable AU BOV filler with a published 5,000 MOQ and some flexibility on small runs. Its client base leans industrial/household/sanitiser, so skincare experience and viscosity limits need checking. | 63 Hincksman St, Queanbeyan East, NSW 2620 | P1 | B · 15/25 | 2/5 | both | 5,000 standard (smaller/tailored runs 'happy to discuss') | unknown — ask | screened |
| Signature Filling Company site → A BOV-specialist contract filler (food, personal care, household) that sells 'flexible run sizes' and custom formulation under one roof. A credible US BOV benchmark. | St. Louis, Missouri, USA | P1 | B · 15/25 | 2/5 | later | 'flexible run sizes' — number not published | custom formulations offered; ownership unknown | longlist |
| Moorebank Aerosol Fillers site → The most indie-friendly AU aerosol house (it markets NPD to 'Indie Founders' and does body care), but BOV is not confirmed. Ask first. | 11 Cunningham St, Moorebank, NSW 2170 | P1 | B · 14/25 | 2/5 | both | not published — ask | unknown — offers NPD + white label; ask | screened |
| Wilson Cosmetics site → A Chinese private-label aerosol house that positions itself as a BOV cosmetics specialist (shower, shaving, hair, sun care). It is the most concrete Asian turnkey BOV lead found, but its claims come from its own advertorials. | Zhuhai, Guangdong, China | P1 | B · 13/25 | 2/5 | later | not published — ask (custom printed alu cans in China often ~20,000 [search snippet, other suppliers]) | private-label by default — custom formula ownership must be contracted | longlist |
| Hydrokem site → A UK contract manufacturer whose pages are titled 'Contract Manufacturing of Aerosol & Bag-on-Valve Products' and 'Aerosol Manufacturing for Cosmetics/Personal Care'. It is the only UK/EU BOV lead found, and verification is minimal. | United Kingdom (site not confirmed) | P1 | C · 12/25 | 4/5 | later | not published — ask | unknown | longlist |
| Pacific Aerosol site → NZ contract aerosol filler (est. 2008) doing personal care and non-aerosol packs. BOV is unconfirmed. Fallback only; trans-Tasman DG freight adds cost. | Hastings, Hawke's Bay, New Zealand | P1 | C · 11/25 | 2/5 | later | not published — ask | unknown (offers product development) | longlist |
| Spraypack site → Long-established Sydney aerosol contract manufacturer (since 1983). No evidence yet of BOV or skincare. Keep it as a backup call only. | Sydney, NSW | P1 | C · 9/25 | 2/5 | now | not published — ask | unknown | longlist |
| Name | Where | Fits | Tier · score | Eczema | Horizon | MOQ | Formula IP | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kolmar Korea site → The best IP stance of the big Korean ODMs ("one formula, one company") and strong derma/sun-care depth, but volumes and access suit Spanner at scale, not at launch. | Sejong / Seoul, KR | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 17/25 | 4/5 | later | Not published. Third-party guides: Tier-1 ODMs 'won't touch you below 5,000 units' [search snippet, unverified] | 'Principle of 1 Prescription to 1 Company' — a formula is never shared with another customer [search snippet]. Exclusivity ≠ ownership; transfer terms unverified | parked |
| Cosmax site → World's largest cosmetics ODM by volume with real derma credentials and every format Spanner needs, but a startup at 500–3,000 units is below its sweet spot; revisit at scale (LATER). | Seongnam (Pangyo HQ) / Hwaseong plant, KR | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 16/25 | 4/5 | later | Not published. Third-party guides: Tier-1 ODMs (Cosmax/Kolmar) 'won't touch you below 5,000 units' [search snippet, unverified] | ODM model: Cosmax develops and typically retains the formula; exclusivity/transfer must be negotiated [search snippet, general norm; not Cosmax-specific] | parked |
| Cosmecca Korea site → Top-4 Korean ODM that makes the gentle, minimalist "cult" K-skincare brands, with reportedly lower entry MOQs than Cosmax/Kolmar; the most realistic big-name Korean option for P1/P3 once Spanner has traction. | Eumseong (Chungcheongbuk-do) plant; R&D Pangyo, Seongnam, KR | P1 · P3 | B · 15/25 | 4/5 | later | 1,000–5,000 units typical (third-party guide) [search snippet, unverified with Cosmecca] | ODM norm: manufacturer retains formula, exclusivity negotiable [search snippet, general norm] | parked |
| CosKorea site → An English-speaking, startup-oriented mid-scale Korean OEM/ODM with 500-unit OEM entry. It is the one Korean route that could plausibly match P2's 500–1,000 unit launch, but on a stock base, not an owned formula. | KR (city not verified) | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 14/25 | 2/5 | now | OEM (proven formulas) from 500 units, 30–45 day production; ODM custom formula 60–120 days dev [search snippet, third-party guide] | OEM route = their proven formula (not Spanner's); ODM custom terms unverified | screened |
| Hankook Cosmetics Manufacturing site → A 60-year-old listed Seoul OEM/ODM that explicitly makes mists and sprays, is ISO 22716 certified and is reachable through Pietra; worth a sample request for P1, though its derma credentials are thin. | Seoul, KR | P1 · P3 | B · 14/25 | 3/5 | later | Not published. Listed as a vetted supplier on Pietra (a small-brand sourcing platform) [search snippet]; actual MOQ unverified | Not found; ODM norm assumed [unverified] | screened |
| MINU STORY site → A small, derma-leaning OEM/ODM with atopic-skin patents and a sensitive-skin cleansing specialty, the closest Korean match to P3's brief. Evidence is thin, so treat it as a lead to verify. | KR (city not verified) | P3 · P1 | B · 14/25 | 4/5 | later | Not found [unverified] | Not found [unverified] | longlist |
| Saehan Cosmetics site → A 70-year-old mid-size OEM/ODM strong in rinse-off (shampoo, treatment, cleansers) with an English export site and ~3,000-unit MOQs; a sensible P3 candidate at the scale-up stage. | KR (city not verified); Indonesia arm (saehancos.id) | P3 · P1 | B · 13/25 | 2/5 | later | ~3,000 units for most products (hair care stated) [site via search snippet] | Not found; ODM norm assumed [unverified] | parked |
| CTKCLIP site → CTK's online development platform: browse Korean formulas and packaging, order samples, launch at 1,000 units. The fastest cheap way to benchmark K-textures, but it is a broker to partner OEMs and the formula would not be Spanner's. | Seoul, KR [unverified] | P1 · P3 | C · 12/25 | 3/5 | now | 1,000 units on 'MOQ 1000'-tagged formulas/packaging [site via search snippet] | Platform of ready-to-develop formulas; brand selects a formula, so ownership unlikely; exclusivity unverified | screened |
| C&C International site → A colour-cosmetics specialist (lip, eye, base) and a poor fit for a barrier-care skincare range; only relevant if Spanner later adds makeup. | KR (city not verified) | P2 | C · 10/25 | 2/5 | later | Not found [unverified] | Not found; assume ODM retention [unverified] | dropped |
| Kolmar BNH site → The Kolmar Group's health-functional-food (supplements) ODM, not a skincare manufacturer. Not a fit for Spanner; approach [[Kolmar Korea]] instead. | KR (city not verified) | - | C · 7/25 | 0/5 | later | n/a — not a cosmetics skincare ODM route for Spanner | n/a | dropped |
| Name | Where | Fits | Tier · score | Eczema | Horizon | MOQ | Formula IP | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eurofins (AU + Dermscan · Evic) site → A one-network option covering micro/PET locally and clinical claims (HRIPT, sensitive skin, ophthalmologist-controlled, sensory) through its European cosmetics CROs. Rigorous, but priced for bigger brands. | Melbourne/Sydney AU labs; Dermscan (Lyon, FR) & Evic (Bordeaux, FR) clinical | P1 · P2 · P3 | A · 19/25 | 5/5 | both | per-study quotes; unknown | n/a (testing) | longlist |
| Dermatest (Sydney) site → Probably the most direct AU route to human-panel claims (HRIPT, sensitive skin, in-use). Everything below needs verifying first. | Sydney, NSW | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 18/25 | 4/5 | now | per-study quotes; unknown | n/a (testing) | longlist |
| AMA Laboratories site → A long-established US cosmetic safety lab known for HRIPT and ophthalmologist-supervised in-use tests. A candidate for P2's "ophthalmologist-tested" claim. | New City, NY, USA | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 17/25 | 3/5 | both | per-study quotes; unknown | n/a (testing) | longlist |
| Complife site → An EU cosmetics CRO known for "tested under ophthalmological control" and sensitive-skin claims. An alternative to Dermscan/Evic. | Garbagnate Milanese (Italy) + intl sites | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 17/25 | 4/5 | later | per-study quotes; unknown | n/a (testing) | longlist |
| Princeton Consumer Research site → A clinical and consumer CRO for sensitive-skin, eczema-prone and in-use claims. An international option if AU labs can't recruit an eczema-prone panel. | UK (Sussex) & USA | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 17/25 | 3/5 | later | per-study quotes; unknown | n/a (testing) | longlist |
| ALS (Australia) site → A large NATA-accredited lab network. Possibly a solid option for batch-release micro and PET, but it offers no human-panel testing. | Multiple AU sites | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 14/25 | 2/5 | now | per-study quotes; unknown | n/a (testing) | longlist |
| Sensory Spectrum site → A specialist in trained descriptive sensory panels (skinfeel). The kind of partner that turns "without the grease" into numbers, but likely expensive. An AU sensory alternative still needs finding. | New Jersey, USA | P1 · P3 | B · 13/25 | 2/5 | later | per-study quotes; unknown | n/a (testing) | longlist |
| Name | Where | Fits | Tier · score | Eczema | Horizon | MOQ | Formula IP | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Europharma Concepts site → The one contract maker confirmed to make an NEA Seal-accepted eczema line (Codex Bia). A proven EU option if Spanner goes to Europe or the US. | Co. Offaly, Ireland | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 16/25 | 5/5 | later | unknown | unknown | longlist |
| Name | Where | Fits | Tier · score | Eczema | Horizon | MOQ | Formula IP | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eczema Association of Australasia site → The only eczema-specific mark usable on AU packs, and it has an Emerging Brands door built for pre-launch indies. First credibility move. | Cleveland, QLD | P1 · P2 · P3 | A · 20/25 | 5/5 | now | n/a — partnership fee quoted on application (unpublished) | n/a (Spanner keeps formula; submitted for panel assessment) | screened |
| National Eczema Association (NEA Seal) site → The global gold-standard eczema seal, but licensed only for US and Canadian markets. Formulate to its rules now; apply when Spanner enters North America. | US (national patient org) | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 18/25 | 5/5 | later | n/a — US$500 application per product + annual licence by company revenue | n/a (full formula with exact % disclosed to NEA) | screened |
| Eczema Association of New Zealand site → NZ counterpart to the EAA. It appears to have its own Emerging Brands page. Relevant when Spanner sells into NZ. | New Zealand | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 17/25 | 5/5 | later | n/a — unknown | n/a | longlist |
| Australasian College of Dermatologists site → No product endorsement found. The route in is conference sponsorship (a trade presence in front of dermatologists), which is scale-stage spend. | Sydney, NSW (national college) | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 13/25 | 3/5 | later | n/a — ASM sponsorship packages (quote); ASCPD industry partner A$5,000 + GST/yr | n/a | screened |
| ASCIA & Allergy & Anaphylaxis Australia site → Dead end for a product mark: ASCIA explicitly does not endorse products, and A&AA says sponsorship is not endorsement. Useful only for allergen facts and education. | Australia (national) | P1 · P2 · P3 | C · 9/25 | 2/5 | later | n/a | n/a | screened |
| Name | Where | Fits | Tier · score | Eczema | Horizon | MOQ | Formula IP | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evonik (SK-INFLUX ceramides) site → Owner of the reference skin-identical ceramide systems (SK-INFLUX). This is the lipid backbone a barrier serum like P1 needs. The access route in AU/NZ is unconfirmed. | ANZ sales office: Mount Waverley, VIC | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 18/25 | 4/5 | both | unknown — industrial packs; small samples via distributor | n/a (ingredient); starter formulations published | screened |
| IMCD Australia site → A big distributor that openly offers formulation guidelines and makes sample prototypes. Useful for free starter formulas while Spanner picks a lab. | Bella Vista, NSW (per Facebook page) | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 17/25 | 3/5 | both | unknown | n/a (distributor); starter formulas/prototypes provided | screened |
| Ingredients Plus site → An independent AU distributor that advertises samples, formulation know-how and regulatory support. A good first call for sample-sized barrier ingredients. | Australia (Asia-Pacific independent distributor) | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 17/25 | 3/5 | now | unknown | n/a (distributor) | screened |
| Symrise (SymCalmin) site → Its SymCalmin avenanthramide soothing active is a strong, fragrance-free way to deliver the "calming" benefit eczema-prone users want. Symrise is also a big fragrance house, so check for cross-contamination. | AU office: Dee Why, NSW | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 17/25 | 4/5 | both | unknown | n/a (ingredient) | screened |
| Alchemy Agencies site → The new exclusive ANZ door to BASF Personal Care (emollients, emulsifiers, actives) and a Symrise agent. A mid-sized independent that is probably more startup-friendly than the global distributors. | NZ/AU (serves Australia, New Zealand, Pacific) | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 16/25 | 3/5 | both | unknown | n/a (distributor) | screened |
| DKSH Australia site → The distributor for Doosan's skin-identical ceramides (e.g. DS-CERAMIDE Y3S) and an Evonik partner in some regions. A route to a second ceramide source. | Australia (52 years in AU) | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 16/25 | 3/5 | later | unknown | n/a (distributor) | screened |
| Cosmetic Ingredients (AU small-quantity) site → An AU online store with a ceramides collection that serves small businesses. Handy for bench samples; check traceability before relying on it. | Australia (online store) | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 15/25 | 3/5 | now | small online quantities (exact sizes not captured) | n/a (retailer) | longlist |
| Croda (Australia) site → A major emollient and actives house (Sederma, Crodarom) with a local presence. Relevant for the mild emollients and emulsifiers in P3, and for barrier actives later. | Croda has Australian operations (details not captured) | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 15/25 | 3/5 | later | unknown | n/a (ingredient) | longlist |
| Formulator Sample Shop site → A US sample-size retailer of the MakingCosmetics type, with a Ceramide Complex (3–5% typical use). Good for early prototyping if AU stock is thin. | US (online; ships internationally [unverified]) | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 15/25 | 3/5 | now | sample sizes | n/a (retailer) | longlist |
| Brenntag Australia site → A global distributor with 16 BPC application labs that develop starting formulas. Worth a request for a free formulary, but AU startup access is unproven. | Australia (global distributor) | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 14/25 | 2/5 | later | unknown | n/a (distributor); publishes starter formulas | longlist |
| Connell Caldic site → Formerly Connell Bros. It merged into Caldic in 2023 and now serves personal care, but no eczema-relevant principals were found. Scale-stage only. | Australia (APAC arm of Caldic) | P1 · P3 | B · 13/25 | 2/5 | later | unknown | n/a (distributor) | longlist |
| Name | Where | Fits | Tier · score | Eczema | Horizon | MOQ | Formula IP | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Krupa Koestline — Clean Cosmetic Chemist, KKT Innovation Labs site → An indie-focused US formulator whose credits include Tower 28, the sensitive-skin brand with NEA seals and EAA partnership. The closest match found to 'has formulated for an eczema-accepted indie'. | US | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 18/25 | 4/5 | both | n/a — consulting fees unknown | unknown — confirm assignment in contract | longlist |
| Eczema Support Australia site → A second, more advocacy-driven AU eczema charity (SOS for Eczema campaign) with an engaged patient community. The best route to real eczema-prone voices and ethical early-tester recruitment. | Australia (national charity) | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 17/25 | 5/5 | now | n/a | n/a | screened |
| Kelly Dobos — Consultant Cosmetic Chemist site → A senior, well-credentialed US consultant chemist and cosmetic-science educator. Good for an independent technical review; no eczema-specific track record found. | Cincinnati, OH | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 16/25 | 3/5 | later | n/a — consulting fees unknown | unknown | longlist |
| Dr Michelle Wong — Cosmetic Chemist & Science Educator, Lab Muffin site → Australia's best-known beauty-science communicator. Better as a science-credibility advisor or reviewer of claims and education content than as a formulator. | Sydney, NSW | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 15/25 | 3/5 | both | n/a | n/a (not a contract formulator) | longlist |
| Formulators Kitchen site → A UK consultancy led by a cosmetic and pharmaceutical scientist ('Colin', 30+ years) with experience in treatments for skin conditions. A possible bridge between cosmetic and derm-style formulation. | UK | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 15/25 | 3/5 | later | unknown | unknown | longlist |
| Name | Where | Fits | Tier · score | Eczema | Horizon | MOQ | Formula IP | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skin Health Institute site → Melbourne's dermatology centre of excellence, with one of Victoria's few patch-testing clinics and an active trials unit. The best AU partner for credible contact-allergy insight and future in-use research. | Level 1, 80 Drummond St, Carlton, VIC | P1 · P2 · P3 | B · 18/25 | 4/5 | both | n/a — research/trial partnership by negotiation | n/a | screened |
| UQ Therapeutics Research Centre site → Australia's leading skin-penetration and barrier science group, with work that explicitly covers cosmetic delivery. A later-stage partner for mechanistic P1 barrier data or an R&D-tax-incentive project. | Frazer Institute / Translational Research Institute, Woolloongabba, QLD | P1 · P2 | B · 16/25 | 3/5 | later | n/a — academic contract research / ARC-style partnership | n/a (negotiate IP in any research agreement) | longlist |
python3 _PIPELINE/build_supplier_pipeline.py after any stage change.